| |
Statistical prediction of the winter NAO
|
 |
| Guidance from the statistical prediction method described here forms one input to our first assessment for Europe/UK winter, issued in July and our official Europe/UK winter forecast issued in September. |
| |
| |
| |
| The North Atlantic
Oscillation (NAO) |
|
| |
|
The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) is a phenomenon associated
with winter fluctuations in temperatures, rainfall and storminess
over much of Europe. When the NAO is in a positive phase westerly winds
are stronger or more persistent, northern Europe tends to be warmer
and wetter than average and southern Europe colder and drier.
When the NAO is in a negative phase westerly winds are weaker or less
persistent, northern Europe tends to be colder and drier and southern Europe
warmer and wetter than average.
The phase and amplitude of the NAO is often described using an index. One of the simplest NAO indices is the
winter difference in pressure at sea level between the Azores
and Iceland. The index used here is somewhat different but
it essentially captures the same phenomenon. |
| Winter 2007/8 NAO
prediction |
|
| |
The figure below shows that the predicted winter NAO index for 2007/8 is weakly negative at -0.05 with a standard error of ±1.0. The near zero amplitude of the predicted index relative to the error bar means that the NAO prediction provides little signal for below- or above-normal European winter temperatures or precipitation. However, the prediction is consistent with a cooler, drier winter over northern Europe as a whole than experienced in winter 2006/7, when the observed index was +1.1.
|
 |
| Details of the NAO
statistical prediction technique |
|
|
The aim of this statistical method is to use the slow variations
and inertia of the Atlantic ocean to predict the atmospheric
circulation. For this method to work, we require the ocean to
have an impact on the overlying atmosphere. Scientific evidence
for such a link from Atlantic sea-surface temperatures (SSTs)
to the winter NAO was presented in Rodwell et al., Nature,
1999, 398, 320-323.
The prediction is based on a maximal covariance analysis of May
North Atlantic SSTs and the following December to February 500 hPa
geopotential heights. In essence, we look for a predictor pattern
in May SSTs (left figure below) that, in the past, has tended
to be associated with the following winter NAO. The NAO is defined
here by the height pattern seen in the right figure below. |
| |
 |
| |
| By taking the observed SST anomaly for
May (figure below) and calculating how it projects onto the predictor
pattern we can make a prediction for the winter NAO. If the projection
is positive (i.e. the anomaly pattern looks similar to the predictor pattern) then the prediction is for
a positive winter NAO. Conversely, if the observed May SST anomaly
projects negatively onto the predictor pattern (i.e. it looks like
the reverse of the predictor pattern) then we would predict a negative
NAO. The NAO index used here is slightly different from the simple
difference in surface pressures between the Azores and Iceland but
the two time-series are quite similar with a correlation of 0.89. |
| |
 |
We have estimated the skill of our predictions and it is
reasonable but by no means high. The link from the Atlantic
ocean to the NAO is not strong enough for any such prediction
method to be very accurate. Hindcast tests, for the period
1948 to 1998, conducted in cross-validation mode (sometimes
known as jack-knife mode) suggest that the correlation skill
is about 0.45 with the correct sign of the NAO predicted
for 66% of all winters. These figures are significant at
the 99% and 98% confidence levels, respectively.
Further details of the prediction system are presented
in Rodwell and Folland, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological
Society, 2002, 128, 1413-1443. |
|
|
|
|
|
|